To introduce the next post, I can really do no better than to quote our friend Dan's last comment on pur previous post - a comment that, if I may, is once again striking for its perspicacity - either that or the rest of us are too lazy and nonchalant or have too little time to reflect on the reality of capitalist production and society - or else are too greedy and corrupt and irresponsible to care:
Thanks for the reply to my previous comment! If I may add one comment to the present analysis, I think we must also consider the role that innovation plays in increasing relative overpopulation. To use Marx's terminology, relative overpopulation can be increased through innovations that decrease the socially necessary labor time embodied in commodities, which cheapens the means of subsistence and frees a portion of the existing labor force to absorb the surplus product. So theoretically capital can remain profitable in spite of a stagnant population if it is able to sufficiently increase productivity on a continual basis. There is much talk lately of a coming automation revolution (e.g. self-driving cars) that will eliminate millions of jobs. However, those hopes may not be realistic, and even if innovation could prop up the rate of profit sufficiently, the environmental threat that you mention would remain because consumption per person would have to grow.
As we have seen in our previous posts,
the Wicksellian notion of “the natural rate of interest” has two main purposes:
one is ideological in the sense that it seeks to justify capitalism and profit
(Wicksell’s “natural rate of interest” is an equilibrium average rate of
profit) as if they were “natural” phenomena. But the other purpose, the one
that seeks such ideological justification in the “physiological” relationship
between the social conflict that capitalism and the wage relation engender (“universally
free competition”), is truly enlightening in that it reveals how the “universally
free competition” needed for the natural rate of interest to obtain is really a
level of social antagonism that may lead to the “unnatural” demise of civilization.
The reason for this link between the
natural rate of interest as “universally free competition” and the demise of civilization
at the hands of “market forces” or capitalism is simply this:
If indeed profit can exist only by
means of the capitalist “saving” or “renouncing” present consumption for the
sake of “future” consumption – and if this “renunciation” is then indefinite
because the capitalist never ends up consuming the “saved” product – then in
that case it is clear that the entire aim of “saving” is for the sake of accumulating
social power over the living activity of more and more workers. Here, workers
stand for the people who do not save and therefore are forced to sell their
living activity to pay for their immediate consumption.
Extrapolating from this schematic
social relation of production, we can then conclude that the effect of
capitalism is to increase the “excess” population on the planet – and therefore
to destroy the environment in order to keep alive this “excess” population.
This population is in “excess” because it exists not in order “to produce” –
because its production would not be “profitable” – but rather in order to
suppress the part of the population that is actually employed by capitalists –
so as to force these workers “to sell” their living labour “in exchange” for
part of the product they produce!
As Thomas Friedman once said, “the
Earth cannot afford 8 billion Americans” because, if the living standards of
Americans are what is needed to maintain capitalism as a system of production,
then the “excess” population needed is such that the environmental demands to
keep it alive are simply impossible to meet! When economists beginning with
Larry Summers and Paul Krugman among a myriad others complain that capitalism
has entered a phase of “secular stagnation” because of “the ageing of the
population”, what they really mean is that the “excess” population needed for
workers to be employed profitably is no longer environmentally and politically “sustainable”
– and therefore neither is capitalist industry and society!
In this regard, let me quote what I
believe is one of the most important passages in the entirety of Karl Marx’s
work – a passage that ought to be read and parsed more carefully than any other
in the history of humanity if we are to protect our future survival on planet
earth:
It is the law of capital, as we have
seen, to create surplus labour, namely, disposable time [free time not needed
for the reproduction of workers or not employed for their leisure]. And it is
able to do so only to the extent that it creates more necessary labour – that
is to say, to the extent that it exchanges dead labour [produced goods] with
the worker [fresh living labour, that is, for human beings who are also forced
to work]. The
tendency of capital therefore is as much to create more [necessary] labour as
is possible [in absolute terms, that is, in terms of numbers of workers], as it
is to reduce the [amount of necessary] labour [needed for the reproduction of
each individual worker relative to disposable labour] to the minimum necessary.
Capital therefore tends both to increase
the working population and to reduce incessantly part of it to the condition of
over-population – as population that is superfluous [useless] until the
moment that capital can utilize it [to create surplus value]. (From which we
derive the truth of the theory of overpopulation and of surplus value.)
Capital
tends both to render human labour (relatively) superfluous and also to push it
beyond all boundaries. Value is nothing other than objectified labour, and
surplus value (the valourisation of capital) is nothing other than the excess
of objectified labour on the amount necessary for the reproduction of the
labour force. But living labour is and remains the fundamental requisite of
objectified labour and of surplus value, while surplus labour [disposable
labour] exists only in relation to necessary labour, and therefore only to the
extent that there still is necessary labour. Capital must therefore incessantly
create more necessary labour [in absolute terms] to create surplus labour [and
therefore surplus value]. It has to multiply surplus labour (by means of
simultaneous working days [by means of more individual workers]) in order to
multiply surplus value. At the same time, capital has to suppress necessary
labour so as to turn it into surplus labour…
It
is for this reason that the capitalist seeks the increase of the working
population. And it is the actual process of reduction of necessary labour that
enables the capitalist to employ new living labour [new workers] (and therefore
create surplus labour [that is, surplus value]). (In other words, the
production of workers becomes “cheaper”; and therefore it is possible to
produce more workers in the same measure as the time for necessary labour
decreases or the time needed for the reproduction of the labour force
decreases....) – K.Marx, Grundrisse, 3.2.25)