The frightful writhing convulsions of the
Deep State that we are witnessing each new day – indeed, it may be said, even
on an hourly basis now, and not just due to the 24-hour news cycle – are only the
symptoms of much deeper and ominous causes. They are a warning to the
bourgeoisie – at the international, not just national level – that its margin
of manoeuvre (what Weber called “Ellebongsraum”, elbow room) is shrinking
alarmingly quickly. The alarums and warning bells are there for everyone to
hear. And because the room to manoeuvre of the bourgeoisie is shrinking so rapidly
this has immediate and, again, terrifying consequences at the inter-national,
geopolitical level. The surreal part of this coming denouement for the global
bourgeoisie is that it seems to come at a time when indeed its power and global
reach seem almost unlimited: but if Nero fiddled while Rome burned, it is also
true that the flames of the coming conflagration will reach the temples of the
nonchalant and indolent bourgeoisie much sooner than it realises.
That margin of manoeuvre (again to return
to Weber, see “Politics as a Vocation”) is afforded to the bourgeoisie by the
parliamentary system and, deeper down into the grassroots of society, by the
party system. Thus, the first harbinger of growing social antagonism and of the
loss of legitimacy of bourgeois rule – the earliest warning sign of the tsunami
that is about to hit the thus-far impregnable fortress of the Deep State – is
the precipitous, spectacular decline of the influence and appeal of political
parties in the parliamentary system. Of course, without popular and strong
political parties able to ensure the adherence of the mass of society to
parliamentary institutions, it is parliaments that will collapse quite rapidly
and sink without a trace in the groundswell of political conflict that will
arise.
Parliaments were initially intended by the
bourgeoisie as political devices to ensure the representation before the feudal
Absolute Monarch of the propertied classes: remember that the initial war-cry
of the bourgeoisie was “no taxation without representation”. But with the
numerical and political rise of the working class from the 18th
Century onwards, the bourgeoisie was forced to grant political representation
to the vast majority of the population (universal suffrage) and also to allow
workers to assemble in a political party. It was the rise of social-democratic
workers’ parties that compelled the bourgeoisie to seek its own form of
party-political representation in the shape of conservative formations seeking
the political support of middle class electorates.
Bourgeois political parties were always
parties of “notables”, popular figures or personalities or “leaders” who could
draw the support of large numbers of the population through connections and
influence. Of course, proletarian revolutionary or “opposition” parties always
posed a danger to bourgeois supremacy in the parliamentary system, so a way had
to be found to integrate or assimilate these opposition parties in the
“parliamentary system”. And the way to do this was to force them to become
“mass” or “umbrella” parties with political programs that did not embody the
“partisan” interests of their members but extended their appeal to “the people”
or “the nation”. Of course, the more political parties have become engulfed and
mired in the parliamentary game, the more their appeal has become “national” to
the point where they have entirely lost any antagonistic substance, that is to
say, to the point where political parties are no longer able “to represent”, as
they were meant to do initially, the conflicting and antagonistic interests of
their members.
Yet this very “massification” of political
parties – the fact that they have been forced to channel and adapt their
antagonistic drive to the homologating strictures of parliamentary and
constitutional rules set up by the bourgeoisie – has emptied their “political”
function of all content and substance and reduced mass parties to the status of
football teams! The real reason behind the decline of bourgeois “liberal
democracy” is the very success of the bourgeois effort to reduce political
parties to arms or instruments or indeed extensions of “the State”: in short,
by turning into arms of the bureaucracy, of the Deep State, political parties –
even and especially(!) “opposition” parties – have signed their own death
decree! The respective electoral mottos of Emmanuel Macron and of Marine Le Pen
in the French presidential election just concluded were “Ensemble, la France”
for the former and “Choisir la France!” for the latter. It would be absurdly
laughable if it were not also tragic! As is amply obvious, the real antagonism
that threatens to tear French and European society asunder is now hidden and
farcically disguised behind besotted appeals to “unity” and “la France”!
The much-trumpeted “decline of social democracy” in
Europe and around the world, which is celebrated by the haute bourgeoisie as
the seal of its ultimate triumph, is in reality the beginning of the end for
the bourgeoisie itself – because once it cannot channel and control by means of
the parliamentary game the antagonism rampant in capitalist society, the
bourgeoisie will find that it is impossible to control its own population let
alone that of other national bourgeoisies, themselves in the throes of
de-legitimisation and political dissolution.
Of course, the massification and dilution,
the evisceration of antagonistic political parties has been achieved not just
through the bureaucratic parliamentary regime established by the bourgeoise
through the Deep State, but also and above all by the cultural and
organisational “massification” of the body politic itself. We have said
repeatedly here that “the bourgeoisie loves the mob”: and it has made
monumental efforts to create a mob by turning the body politic into a shapeless
mass of abulic individuals through concerted attacks on the organic composition
of the working class and, to no small extent, through the brutalisation of
everyday life consequent upon the denial of social services and also, last but
not least, through the culture industry – the entire bizarre machinery of panis et circenses (bread and circuses)
that ranges from Hollywood to show business broadly as well as advertising and marketing.
This specific form of propaganda comes
naturally to the capitalist bourgeoisie: capitalism, after all, is a form of
domination whereby workers “freely” alienate their living labour “in exchange
for” the objectified products of their activity (“dead labour”), which the
capitalist then uses “to purchase” the living labour of other workers, and so
on ad infinitum. This impossible exchange involves, of course, the coaxing of
workers to purchase their own products from the capitalist – something that we
know as “consumerism”. And consumerism requires marketing as the main form of
persuasion (recall V. Packard’s famous work “The Hidden Persuaders”). In short,
the bourgeoisie is masterful in devising infinitely devious and diabolical ways
of selling its peculiar brand of slavery. By the same token, this sales effort
must be able to hide and disguise – indeed, to present as desirable – all the
deleterious and despicable practices that debase, defile and distort human
instincts and values. Thus, for instance, motor vehicles that pollute the
ecosphere are sold with lakes and mountains in the background, driven on roads with
no other vehicles in sight… It takes just one simple instance like this to
illustrate once and for all the self-destructive suicidal bent to which global
capital, the bourgeoisie, is driving humanity.
Even more than the mob, the bourgeoisie is
entranced by the degree of political and social mastery and command over their
populations exhibited by “Oriental” and Eurasian dynasties such as those of
Imperial and now Maoist China, and those of Czarist and then Stalinist Russia.
In the guise of Donald Trump, of course, this extends to Putin’s Russia, as we
know. Perhaps the most odious aspect of late capitalism is the way in which it
presents new and more insidious and powerful methods of political domination
such as “artificial intelligence” as ineluctable aspects of human Progress, as
capable of solving all human problems when in fact they are just hideous
illustrations of the intolerable brutality and hubris of the bourgeoisie
against which we shall either rise up or else to which we shall infallibly
succumb.
No comments:
Post a Comment