The Times, 
Share
Save
At about 9.30pm Li Wenliang’s heart stopped beating. But when news of the whistblowing Chinese doctor’s death hit the internet, the public outpouring of grief and anger was so overwhelming the authorities felt that they must “undo” his death.
So the unthinkable happened. State media retracted the death notice and swore that Dr Li, 33, was only critically ill. He was officially declared dead, for the second time, at 2.58am. By then censors had been busy at work, removing posts and comments online.
Li Wenliang’s death was “cancelled” by the authorities; he died officially several hours later
Li Wenliang’s death was “cancelled” by the authorities; he died officially several hours laterEPA
Dr Li, an ophthalmologist from the city of Wuhan, sounded the alarm in December over the threat posed by a Sars-like virus, but was ordered to stay silent. He was among the first to speak out about what would become known as Covid-19, the novel coronavirus that has since killed 3,140 people and infected more than 80,000 people in China.
His death on February 7 sent propagandists into overdrive to avoid any threat to party rule. Such deft manipulation of public opinion demonstrates the power of President Xi and the ruling Communist Party; its well-oiled, ruthlessly effective propaganda machine appears to have smashed any illusion that the country’s biggest public health crisis in decades may become China’s Chernobyl.
Analysts agree that Mr Xi, 66, and his party could emerge even stronger in the aftermath of coronavirus, convincing people that a powerful leader is needed to cope in such worrying times.
“There have been lots of criticisms, but those criticisms have been behind his back. There’s no direct challenge to him, and he will strengthen the party rule for his benefit,” Willy Lam, a political analyst at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, said.
Crucially, the virus has given the party a pretext to expand surveillance — deploying everything from advanced facial recognition software, to thermal camera-equipped drones that can detect fevers — and tighten controls on speech, all in the name of fighting Covid-19. Meanwhile state media portrays Mr Xi as a decisive, caring and effective leader. Last week the official Xinhua news agency detailed his every move and every word about the outbreak to show his dedication to his people.
In Sichuan province police wear helmets with infrared cameras that can measure body temperature and relay the result on a screen
In Sichuan province police wear helmets with infrared cameras that can measure body temperature and relay the result on a screenZHANG LANG/GETTY IMAGES
“His special attention at this special time shows that President Xi has a pure heart like a newborn’s that has people as his number one priority,” the Xinhua article concluded.
According to an analyst in China who requested anonymity: “The disaster is obviously a threat to the big boss, but there’s no viable opponent from within the party, and he will turn the crisis into an opportunity and further strengthen his leadership.”
He added that “people thought the party could fall after the Wenchuan earthquake”, referring to the 2008 disaster that left nearly 90,000 dead or missing in the southwest province of Sichuan. “It was wishful thinking — controls grew tighter.”
Not surprisingly, Beijing imposed more draconian rules on online speech on March 1. Censorship has expanded since the outbreak, with police tracking down and detaining at least three citizen journalists who had posted candid videos from Wuhan, the hardest-hit city, to overseas websites that are banned in China.


Also in line with the propaganda playbook, censors have allowed and encouraged misinformation about foreign countries, especially the United States, to discredit any democratic government’s handling of the outbreak. It serves to flatter Beijing and convince citizens that their political system is superior. Note how quickly the foreign ministry criticised Washington for stoking fears and causing panic when it evacuated its citizens from Wuhan.
Among the rumours that have spread rapidly on social media are that Covid-19 originated in the US, a myth perpetuated by Zhong Nanshan, the country’s leading epidemiologist and pulmonologist, who gave an ambiguous statement that the coronavirus “might not begin in China”, and by Zhao Lijian, a foreign ministry spokesman, who alleged last month that no one yet knew for certain its origin.
Beijing also deflected any blame for the cover-up of the virus in its early stages on to local officials, removing party chiefs in Wuhan and the province of Hubei to public applause. In a departure from the response to the Sars outbreak in 2002-03, however, Beijing made the personnel reshuffle among party ranks, rather than dismissing the city mayor and provincial governor.
State media said that “President Xi has a pure heart like a newborn’s that has people as his number one priority
State media said that “President Xi has a pure heart like a newborn’s that has people as his number one priorityALAMY
Concerns are growing that Mr Xi will exploit the health crisis even further to track citizens’ movements and collect yet more personal data.
Since coronavirus took hold technology companies have developed software to identify a person by scanning only their eyes and forehead instead of their full face. Police departments across the country are deploying drones to enforce the curfew and a colour-coded system introduced to determine if anyone should be quarantined or stopped from boarding a commuter train sends personal data to a server controlled by the government.


Checks and screenings have been so intense that the authorities say that they have caught fugitives who have been on the run for years, finally stopped in their tracks by the anti-virus campaign.
“The coronavirus outbreak is proving to be one of those landmarks in the history of the spread of mass surveillance in China,” Maya Wang, a China researcher for Human Rights Watch, told The New York Times.