China’s planned ban on offensive clothing shows growing intolerance
September 24, 2023 at 8:00 a.m. EDT
Add to your saved stories
China’s authoritarian rulers already try to control what its citizens read, see and even think. But the ever-paranoid leaders are apparently still not content with their near-domination over the private lives of the people they purport to represent. Now they want to control what Chinese citizens wear.
The Standing Committee of China’s legislature, the National People’s Congress, has published the draft of a proposal to ban clothing deemed “detrimental to the spirit of the Chinese people” and that “hurt the feelings” of the Chinese people. Anyone caught sporting such offensive clothing could be subject to a fine of up to $680 and up to 15 days in jail.
As usual in China, the purpose of the proposed new law was not spelled out. But it comes after a spate of incidents involving Chinese citizens wearing traditional Japanese clothing, which infuriates hard-line nationalists given the two countries’ wartime history. In one incident, a woman in Suzhou city was detained by police for wearing a Japanese kimono; she was accused of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble.” That’s the catchall phrasing China’s authorities use to target anyone considered a troublemaker. Other Chinese citizens dressed in “cosplay” to imitate Japanese anime characters were also reportedly harassed.
Wisconsin Republicans back off impeachment threat against justice
Bahrain’s hunger strike ends, for now, after concessions to prisoners
A Saudi court sentences a retired teacher to death based on tweets.
March 4is a sensible day to start Trump’s Jan. 6 federal trial.
Uganda enforces draconian anti-gay law.
Arkansas should recognize AP African American Studies course.
Wisconsin state Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R) announced Tuesday that Republicans would allow the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau to draw legislative maps, a dramatic reversal after years of opposing such an approach to redistricting. A new liberal majority on the state Supreme Court is expected to throw out the current maps, which make Wisconsin the most gerrymandered state in America. Mr. Vos has been threatening to impeach Justice Janet Protasiewicz, whose election this spring flipped control of the court, in a bid to keep those maps. This led to understandable outcry. Now it seems Mr. Vos is backing off his impeachment threat and his efforts to keep the state gerrymandered. Read our editorial on the Protasiewicz election here.
A retired teacher in Saudi Arabia, Muhammad al-Ghamdi, has been sentenced to death by the country’s Specialized Criminal Court solely based on his tweets, retweets and YouTube activity, according to Human Rights Watch. The court’s verdict, July 10, was based on two accounts on X, formerly Twitter, which had only a handful of followers. The posts criticized the royal family. The sentence is the latest example of dictatorships imposing harsh sentences on people who use social media for free expression, highlighted in our February editorial.
During a Monday hearing, Judge Tanya S. Chutkan rejected as “far beyond what is necessary” Donald Trump’s demand to postpone until mid-2026 his trial for allegedly obstructing the results of the 2020 election. Instead, she plans to begin the trial on March 4 — the day before Super Tuesday. Six months is more than enough time for defense counsel to prepare. GOP primary voters deserve to know the outcome when choosing their standard-bearer. Read our recent editorial on why these charges against Trump are warranted.
The proposed ban on offensive clothing is itself offensive on many levels. But most worrisome is the lack of specificity in the draft language. Nowhere is it defined what specific clothing items might be considered “detrimental to the spirit of the Chinese people.” And what specific piece of clothing might hurt the Chinese people’s delicate sensibilities is not clarified. That vagueness would empower any police officer on the street to detain pretty much anyone wearing anything the police officer didn’t like.
Many other countries have clothing bans, usually involving religious, cultural or historic reasons. Germany outlaws public displays of swastikas or other Nazi symbols. Some Muslim countries in the Middle East prohibit women from venturing outside without head or face coverings. Culturally conservative countries such as Uganda dictate that women cannot wear short miniskirts above the knee. Some tourist destinations in Croatia and the Maldives warn visitors not to wear skimpy swimwear away from the beaches. Greece bans high heels at ancient sites.
Story continues below advertisement
In 2010 France, concerned about a rise in Muslim immigration and fiercely protective of its secular identity, passed a law banning full-face coverings in public, which included burqas along with motorcycle helmets, ski masks and balaclavas.
But China’s proposed ban is unusually draconian for its lack of specificity and for seeming to target any form of individual attire that might offend the Communist Party’s notions of patriotism and nationalism, which lately have become increasingly anti-Western.
The proposed law change was published on a government website for a period of public consultation, which extends until the end of September. So far, the feedback has been largely negative, with lawyers, scholars, journalists and ordinary citizens bemoaning this latest crackdown on personal freedom and free expression as an example of the rulers’ growing intolerance.
Story continues below advertisement
China’s closed and secretive Communist leadership almost never listens to the views of its own people, and this kind of consultation is usually little more than performative. But if the leaders do not pay attention to the feedback, they will risk further alienating the young and creative Chinese whom the world’s second-largest economy needs to prosper in decades to come.